Local Eyam lore tells befuddling stories of plague survivors who had close
contact with the bacterium but never caught the disease. Elizabeth Hancock
buried six children and her husband in a week, but never became ill. The
village gravedigger handled hundreds of plague-ravaged corpses, but survived
as well. Could these people have somehow been immune to the Black Death?
Dr. Stephen O'Brien of the National Institutes of Health in Washington D.C.
suggests they were. His work with HIV and the mutated form of the gene CCR5,
called "delta 32," led him to Eyam. In 1996, research showed that delta 32
prevents HIV from entering human cells and infecting the body. O'Brien
thought this principle could be applied to the plague bacteria, which
affects the body in a similar manner. To determine whether the Eyam plague
survivors may have carried delta 32, O'Brien tested the DNA of their
modern-day descendents. What he found out was startling. ...
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Joan Plant, tracing family tree.
|
 |
For a disease-causing microorganism to infect the human body there must be a
gateway or portal through which it enters into human cells. The plague
bacterium works this way, hijacking the white blood cells sent to eliminate
it. Traveling inside the white blood cells to the lymph nodes, the bacteria
break out and attack the focal point of the human immune system. Dr. Stephen
O'Brien felt that the mutated CCR5 gene, delta 32, may have prevented the
plague from being able to enter its host's white blood cells.
Eyam provided O'Brien an ideal opportunity to test this theory.
Specifically, Eyam was an isolated population known to have survived a
plague epidemic. Everyone in the town would have been exposed to the
bacterium, so it's likely that any life-saving genetic trait would have been
possessed by each of these survivors. "Like a Xerox machine," says O'Brien,
"their gene frequencies have been replicated for several generations without
a lot of infusion from outside," thus providing a viable pool of
survivor-descendents who would have inherited such a trait.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Dr. Bill Paxton examines Steve Crohn's DNA.
|
 |
Knowing who died and who lived through the early years of the plague is
somewhat problematic. Deaths among the general English population were not
recorded in the 14th Century -- the height of the Plague -- and most
communities did not begin recording parish registers until around 1538.
Fortunately, Eyam began keeping a parish register in 1630. Thus historian
John Clifford began by examining the register, noting everyone who was alive
in 1665, the year the plague came to Eyam. He searched for evidence of life
through the year 1725 -- marriages, baptisms, burials that took place years
after the plague had left the village. Deleting the names of those lost
during the plague period, he was able to determine who the survivors were.
DNA samples could only be collected from direct descendents of the plague
survivors. DNA is the principal component of chromosomes, which carry the
genes that transmit hereditary characteristics. We inherit our DNA from our
parents, thus Eyam resident Joan Plant, for instance, may have inherited the
delta 32 mutation from one of her ancient relatives. Plant can trace her
mother's lineage back ten generations to the Blackwell siblings, Francis and
Margaret, who both lived through the plague to the turn of the 18th century.
The next step was to harvest a DNA sample from Joan and the other
descendants. DNA is found in the nuclei of cells. The amount is constant in
all typical cells, regardless of the size or function of that cell. One of
the easiest methods of obtaining a DNA tissue sample is to take a cheek, or
buccal, swab.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Crohn's blood, resisting infection.
|
 |
After three weeks of testing at University College in London, delta 32 had
been found in 14% of the samples. This is a genetically significant
percentage, yet what, really, did it mean? Could the villagers have
inherited delta 32 from elsewhere, residents who had moved to the community
in the 350 years since the plague? Was this really a higher percentage than
anywhere else? To find out, O'Brien assembled an international team of
scientists to test for the presence of delta 32 around the world. "Native
Africans did not have delta 32 at all," O'Brien says, "and when we looked at
East Asians and Indians, they were also flat zero." In fact, the levels of
delta 32 found in Eyam were only matched in regions of Europe that had been
affected by the plague and in America, which was, for the most part, settled
by European plague survivors and their descendents.
Meanwhile, recent work with another disease strikingly similar to the
plague, AIDS, suggests O'Brien was on the right track. HIV, the virus that
causes AIDS, tricks the immune system in a similar manner as the plague
bacterium, targeting and taking over white blood cells. Virologist Dr. Bill
Paxton at the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center in New York City noticed,
"the center had no study of people who were exposed to HIV but who had
remained negative." He began testing the blood of high-risk, HIV-negative
individuals like Steve Crohn, exposing their blood to three thousand times
the amount of HIV normally needed to infect a cell. Steve's blood never
became infected. "We thought maybe we had infected the culture with bacteria
or whatever," says Paxton. "So we went back to Steve. But it was the same
result. We went back again and again. Same result." Paxton began studying
Crohn's DNA, and concluded there was some sort of blocking mechanism
preventing the virus from binding to his cells. Further research showed that
that mechanism was delta 32.
Scientists studying HIV first learned about the gateway-blocking capacity of
the CCR5 mutation in 1996. Several drug companies, then, quickly began
exploring the possibility of developing pharmaceuticals that would mimic
delta 32 by binding to CCR5 and blocking the attachment of HIV. Previous
methods of treatment interfered with HIV's ability to replicate after the
virus has already entered a cell. This new class of HIV treatment, called
early-inhibitor -- or fusion-inhibitor -- drugs seek to prevent the virus
from ever attaching at all. These pharmaceuticals are still in relatively
early stages of development, but certainly stand as a hopeful new method of
approaching HIV treatment.